The tenth presidential election and protests against the election results also affected the upcoming elections. So that the discourse discussions of that period were evaluated as an analytical tool for Iranian electoral behavior by the political elites. In this way, the study of the context of discourses that were in conflict during the election could help find a way to reduce political antagonism and turning out the axis of violence into a dialogue-driven debate. In this study, by reviewing the structure of the discourses in the present Elections 2009 examined the context, the social gaps that were far from the election that shaped the conflict strategies between the representatives of fundamentalist and reformist discourses. The above study, described in the library method using the method of discourse analysis, Discourse strategies in discourse conflicts Ryat Laclau, Memphis, and in the description and interpretation of texts produced by representatives of discourse theory is enjoying Fairclough. In so doing, while referring to the discourses in the election, 2009, he examined the constituent elements of the discourse with emphasis on investigating the impact of social gaps on the formation of discourses. The study concluded in its findings that after-election events Should be evaluated in the production of the production of metaphorical reality in the context of the representational context of the discourse of society, when the representatives of the discourses at that time, by ignoring the gaps of the Iranian community, tried to block the dialogue and, using the tactics The antagonists of the deputies remove discourse readings.
