Political scholars and philosophers have always investigated the state sovereignty as an essential element in the structure of the state. Although the state sovereignty has been mentioned as an uncontested power, this power has created challenges in the international context. One of the major challenges has taken place in the context of conflict right, that we have witnessed an increasing number of them in the world, especially in the Middle East region. The question we have to answer it is the relationship between state sovereignty and the development of the rights of non-international armed conflicts, and which concept will link these two variables. The method used in this paper is an analytical-critical method. Although scholars of international politics and international law have referred to one aspect of these concepts, there has not yet been a view in line with finding a relation between sovereignty and the development of unexpressed conflicts rights. Given that, on the one hand, the sovereignty of states dependent on post-Westphalian order is tied to the concept of national interests, on the other hand, this is the sovereignty that stands as a barrier to the rights of non-international armed conflicts. It can be deduced that one of the most fundamental obstacles to the development of this emerging field of rights is foreign sovereignty, which is justified by national interests. Therefore, it is necessary to reread this concept.
