The results of secondary rules and recognition of secondary titles and mandates in family law are one of the few topics that have been discussed. Secondary titles are titles that are fixed for objects in view of what is out of its essence, and the first decisions are to observe the natural states and normal status according to the well - known secondary of the observers. In the sense that there is no ambiguity in the concept of titles and division, but it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the first and second title and consequently it is difficult to distinguish between the first and secondary titles and consequently it is difficult to explain the first and second order. In other words, some of the first decisions are in order to ward off the loss or loss of the state of state. In this case, how can it be realized that the verdict is the first or the second and the title specified in that first or secondary? Also, the legislation on the basis of secondary titles has special codes and criteria that neglect sometimes affects the religious nature of the rules, and sometimes will pursue administrative problems. After the studies in this paper, which is based on the library method, it has been clear that it is easier to distinguish the first and secondary directions of the criteria and measures which make the first and more precise order of the first and more precise, and there is a way for legislation the secondary rules that are investigated and evaluated in this study.
