Introduction: In the course of scientific communication in the production of a scientific work there are always key positions occupied by key people. Identifying these positions and the impact of each, whether positive or negative, in the research process is the main objective of this research. Methods: In this research, using the network structure analysis techniques and using the co-authoring method, the authors have discovered the pattern of scientific collaboration between the authors of the field of Medical Genetics. The choice of this field is due to its interdisciplinary nature in medical research, with many scientific contacts going on. Since the main issue of this research is the study of scientific communication, co-authored techniques as one of the known methods in this field were used as a research method. Results: The results of this analysis showed that many relationships in the network are remained potential. There is a high willingness for scholars to cooperate in this field. The information on this network is moving at an acceptable rate between the researchers. The availability of information on this network has been reported weak. According to the Iegener Factor, 70 nodes have more significant links. In spite of the results, none of the researchers are in high position on the basis of structural hole indices. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, there were no significant differences between the structural hole indices as goalkeeper nodes in this study. Therefore, the use of central nodes as gatekeepers based on the findings of this research is more logical. The results of this research can be generalized to many emerging areas of medical science, as this area is highly interdisciplinary and common themes are common in its fields.
