Evidence and testimony are among the most widely used reasons to prove oneself in a quarrel. It is possible that in an argument different reasons would be in contrast with each other. In this case, one evidence or reason rejects another one. The judiciary and testimonies chapters are those which are in direct association with human community and people are always in need of these of hers in the community and the judge cannot make a right decision in the court without any evidence or testimonies, therefore there is a requirement of explaining the issues and various provisions based on laws. In this article, we will scrutinize how the conflict occurs between reasons, and how these conflicts can be eradicated and which reason is prior than the other one and so forth. Besides, the idea of the jurisprudence scholars and the law experts will be analyzed and this fact that why such argument wasn't paid too much tribute in law will also be taken into account.
