In order to be able to introduce our jurisprudential basics in a regular and systematic form in proportion to the frameworks known to the law researchers around the globe, it is necessary to investigate the two important jurisprudential schools of the contemporary era, to wit Najaf and Qom schools, via an analytical method so that the weak points of each can be avoided and advantage can be taken of the strong points of each. Thus, the fundamental basics, Hadith study and biographical evaluation of the dignitaries in each of the two schools as well as the jurisprudential resources and their realms and also the methods of inference used by each of these two schools should be identified and investigated. The current research paper uses a library research method to direct attentions to the expressions by the prominent jurisprudents thereby to examine one of the dignitaries’ basics regarding the issuance and documentary authenticities of Hadith and criticize and explore the proofs offered by each of these two schools to finally come up with the selection of Qom’s jurisprudential school perspective that relies on issuance authenticity of Hadith.
