• anasayfa
  • HAKKIMIZDA
  • BİLİM KURULU
  • son sayı
  • arşiv
  • İNDEKS BİLGİLERİ
  • İLETİŞİM
english

Absurdity and Associated Ontological Issues
  1. Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov.
  2. Arkhangelsk, Russia Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov.
ABSTRACT

The purpose of the article is to consider the ontological framework for logical paradoxes, the Gorgias logical paradox and the Parmenides’ poem in particular. The research methods: Aristotle's semantic analysis of the verb "to be", which the traditional interpretation is based on, a semantic analysis of the verb "to be" carried out by analytical philosophers, comparison of Meinong and Russell 's positions on the use of objects in logic. Conclusions and results: the article examines different interpretations of the Gorgias’ paradox and the Parmenides’ poem. The traditional interpretation is related to the understanding of the verb "to be" as a verb having existential meaning. An analytical interpretation gives true meaning to the verb "to be". As a consequence of the change in the verb meaning, the meaning of Parmenides’ poem and Gorgias’ paradox changes as well: traditional interpretation placed the emphasis on the problem of Parmenides’ being, analytical interpretation shifts the focus to gnoseological issues‎‎‎.



Keywords:

Download PDF
View HTML
Print Article
Share Article
Select a format:
Download RIS
Download EndNote

How to cite:
YURYEVICH O M & BORISOVICH T N. Absurdity and Associated Ontological Issues. Journal Of Organizational Behavior Research 2020;5(1):142-7


references

Aristotle's Metaphysics (2002). Translated by Sachs, Joe (2nd ed.). Green Lion Press, Santa Fe, N.M.

 

Celler E. (1996). Essay of the History of Greek Philosophy. Aleteya.

 

Heath, P.L., & Carroll, L. (1982). The Philosopher's Alice: Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. – St Martins Pr.

 

Lebedev A.V. (1989). Fragments of early Greek philosophers Part 1. Publishing House «Science», Moscow.

 

Meinong A. (2003). Self-statement. DIK, Moscow.

 

Meinong A. (2011). About the theory of objects. Epistemologiya & Philosophy, 17-1, 202-229.

 

Russell B. (1956). Logic and Knowledge. George Allen & Unwin LTD, London. P. 39-56.

 

Selivörstov V.V. (2015). Mainongian theory of non-existent subjects: problems and conclusions. Negativity ontology. Collection of scientific works. «Canon», ROOI «Rehabilitation», Moscow.

  • Makale Gonderim Kurallari
    • Yazım Kuralları
    • Yazıların Değerlendirilmesi
  • Makale Çağrısı
  • Sıkça Sorulan Sorular
  • special issues
copyright ©2021 Örgütsel Davranış Araştırmaları Dergisi tüm hakları saklıdır