• homepage
  • AIM And SCOPE
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • current issue
  • Archive
  • INDEXING
  • Contact Us
  • Submission

GENDER COMPARISON IN ONLINE SHOPPING IN TERMS OF PRODUCT CLASSIFICATION AND SHOPPING MOTIVATIONS
Nihal SUTUTEMIZ¹
Metin SAYGILI²*
ABSTRACT

This study had two aims. The first was to determine whether the products purchased on-line by the consumers were in hedonic or utilitarian product category and whether these categories were related to gender or not, while the second aim was to determine the hedonic and utilitarian factors that drive consumers to online shopping, and whether these factors were related to gender or not. The study had several subsidiary aims such as defining the place of online shopping among the internet usage aims, describing the advantages of online shopping and most common problems of internet shopping in terms of gender. In this context, the universe of this positivist study comprised 18 year and older online shoppers. 481 consumers accepted to join the study on a voluntary basis with convenient sampling method and constituted the study sample. Study data was collected from the participants through online surveys. Findings showed that hedonic and utilitarian product preferences and shopping motivations were related to gender.



Keywords: Online Shopping , Utilitarian Product , Hedonic Product , Shopping Motivations

Download PDF
Select a format:
Download RIS
Download EndNote



references

Altunisik, R. and Calli, L. (2004). Impulse Buying Shopping and Hedonic Consumption A Research on Behavioral Behaviors: Information Use in the Decision of Procurement, 3. National Information, Economics and Management Congress, Eskisehir, 25-26 November, 231-240.

Anderson, C. (1997). Survey of Electronic Commerce: In Search of The Perfect Market The Economist, 343, 3-5.

Armagan, E. A. and Turan, A. H. (2014). Internet Shoppıng: The Effect Of Demographic Factors And Individual Requirements: An Empirical Assesment, Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 28 (3): 1-22.

Arnould, M. J. and Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic Shopping Motivations, Journal of
Retailing, 79(2):77-95.

Aydin, A. E. (2013). A Research on Factors Effect The Hedonic and Utilitarian Value Attached to The Products, Unpublished Master Thesis, Mugla, Muga Sitki Kocman University Institute of Social Sciences.

Babacan, M. (2001). Reflection on Hedonic Consumption and Special Days Shopping, 6. National Marketing Congress Proceedings Book, 97-106.

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. and Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring
Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4): 644- 656.

Batra, R. and Ahtola, O. T. (1990). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of
Consumer Attitudes, Marketing Letters, 2(2):159-17.

Bellman, S., Lohse, G. and Jhonson, E. (1999). Predictors of Online Buying Behavior, Communiction for the ACM, 42(12), 32-38.

Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics Notes: Cronbach's Alpha, Bmj, 314:572.

Burke, R. R. (2002). Technology and Consumer Interface: What Consumers Want in
the Physical and Virtual Store” Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (5): 411-432.

Cakmak, A. Ç. and Cakir, M. (2012). Hedonic Consumption Behaviours of the Young People Aged 12-18: A Research in the City Center of Kocaeli, Journal of History, Culture and Art Research, 1 (4): 171-189.

Cardoso, P.R. and S.C. Pinto (2010). Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Motivations among Portuguese Young Adult Consumers, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 38(7):538-558.

Celik, S. (2009). Hedonic and Benefit Consumption, Istanbul, Derin Publications.

Ceylan, C. (2007). An Investigation on The Reasons of Hedonic Consumption, Unpublished Master Thesis, Erzurum, Ataturk University Institute of Social Sciences.

Chen, M. H., Lee, H. H., Tsai, K. M and Lin, L. S. W. (2008). Ceating Values for Online Shoppers. International Conference on Business and Information, South Korea, Seoul: Academy of Taiwan Information Systems Research, 7-9 July, 5.1: http://ibacnet.org/bai2008 (02.09.2014).

Childers, T. L., Carr, L. C., Peck, J. and Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and Utilitarian
Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior, Journal of Retailing, 77:511–535.

Davis, R., Lang, B. and Diego, J. S. (2014). How Gender Affects The Relationship Between Hedonic Shopping Motivation and Purchase Intentions?, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(1): 18-30.

Demirel, H. (2010). Views of University Students About Online Shopping, Gazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12 (3): 119-134.

Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1):60-71.

Dogan, H. G., Gurler, A. Z. and Agcadag, D. (2014). Evaluation of Effective Factor to Hedonic Consumption Habits (Tokat Province Case), The Journal of International Social Research, 7 (30): 69-77.

Dogrul, U. (2012). The Effect of Utilitarian and Hedonic Motivations on Electronic Shopping Behavior, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4 (1): 321-331.

Dundar, S. and Yoruk, D. (2009). The Factors Affecting Consumers' Attitudes towards Online Shopping, Economics, Business and Finance, 24 (278): 92-109.

Enginkaya, E. (2006). Electronics Retailing and Electronics Shopping, Ege Academic Review, 6 (1): 10-16.

Fettahlioglu H. S., Yildiz A. and Birin C. (2014). Hedonic Comsumption Behaviors: A Comparative Analysis of The Effects of Demographic Factors on Hedonic Shopping Behaviours of The Students At Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University And Adiyaman University, International Journal of Social Science, 27: 307- 331.

Grewal, D., Iyer, G. R. and Levy, M. (2004). Internet Retailing: Enablers, Limiters and
Market Consequneces, Journal of Business Research, 57:703-713.

Guido, G. (2006). Shopping Motives, Big Five Factors, And The Hedonic/Utilitarian Shopping Value: An Integration and Factorial Study, Innovative Marketing, 2(2):57-67.

Guler, B. (2013). Factors That Determine E-Customers' Hedonic Consumption Behaviors and A Survey, Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul: Galatasaray University Institute of Social Sciences.

Hae-Sook, K. (2005). The Types of Clothing Shopping Value and The Classification of Consumer Group By Shopping Values, Journal of Fashion Bussiness, 9(6):126-140.

Hasan, B. (2010). Exploring Gender Differences in Online Shopping Attitude, Computers in Human Behavior, 26:597-601.

Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions, Journal of Marketing, 46(2):92-101.

Horrigan, J. B. and Raini, L. (2002). Getting Serious Online: Pew Internet and American Life Project, March 3. www.pewinternet.org (17.09.2014)

Izgi, B. B. and Sahin, I. (2013). Electronic Retail Sector and Internet Shopping Consumer Behavior: The Case of Turkey, Journal of Economics and Management Reseach, 2 (1): 9-27.

Jarvenpaa S., Peter, L. and Todd, A. (1996). Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2):59-88.

Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Todd, P. A. (1997). Is There a Future for Retailing on The Internet?  In Robert A. Peterson (ed.) Electronic Marketing and The Consumer, 139–154.

Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N. and Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer Trust in an Internet Store, Information Technology and Management, (1):45-77.

Johnson, D. (1998). Who’s on the Internet and Why. Futurist, 32(6):11-12.

Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E. and Arnould, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and Utilitarian
Shopping Value: Investigating Differential Effects on Retail Outcomes, Journal of Business Research, 59:974–981.

Khan U., Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2005). A Behavioral Decision Theory Perspective on Hedonic and Utilitarian Choice, S. Ratneshwar, ve D. G. Mick (ed.), Inside Consumption Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, 144-165.

Kim, H. S. (2006). Using Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Motivations to Profile Inner City Consumers, Journal of Shopping Center Research, 13(1):57-79.

Kim, S. Y. and Lim, Y. J. (2001). Consumers Percieved Importance of and Satisfaction with Internet Shopping, Electronic Markets, 11(3):148-154.

Kircova, I. (2008). Internet Marketing, 4th Edition. Istanbul, Beta Publishing Distribution.

Kirgiz, A. (2014). Hedonism A Consumer Disease of The Modern Age: Gender and Hedonic Shopping In Turkey, Global Media Journal: TR Editon, 4(8):200-212.

Koker, N. E. and Maden, D. (2012). Perceptions of the Consumer on Product Based Innovation in the Context of Hedonic and Utilitarian Consumption: An Empirical Research, Journal of Business Research-Turk, 4 (2): 94-121.

Kop, A. E. (2008). A Practise about Hedonic and Utilitarian Consumption in Consumer Behavior, Unpublished Master Thesis, Istanbul, Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences.

Korgaonkar, P. and Wolin, L. D. (2002). Web Usage, Advertising And Shopping:
Relationship Patterns, Internet Research, 12(2):191-204.

Kotler, P. (2002). Guru Talking, Istanbul, Capital Publications.

Li, N. and Zhang, P. (2002). Consumer Online Shopping Attitudes and Behavior: An Assessment of Research, Eight Americas Conference on Information Systems, 74:508-517.

Malhotra, N. K. (1996), Marketing Research. An Applied Orientation, Second Edition. New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall.

Mariotti, S. and Sgobbi, F. (2001). Alternative Paths for The Growth of E-Commerce, Futures, 33:109-125.

Nielsen, A. (2008). Trends in Online Shopping a Global Nielsen Consumer Report, February.

O’ Brien, H. L. (2010). The Influence of Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations on User Engagement: The Case of Online Shopping Experiences, Interacting With Computers: Special Issue on User Experience, 22(5):344-352.

Odabasi, Y. and G. Baris. (2002). Consumer Behavior, Istanbul, MediaCat Kitapları.

Overby, J. W. and Lee, E. J. (2006). The Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Online
Shopping Value on Consumer Preference and Intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59: 1160–1166.

Ozdemir, S. ve Yaman, F. (2007). A Research on the Differentiation of Hedonic Shopping by Gender, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2 (2): 81- 91.

Palumbo, F. and Herbig, P. (1998). International Marketing Tool, The Internet. Intustrial Managements Data Systems, 98(6):253-261.

Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S. and Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). Exploring The Implications Of The Internetfor Consumer Marketing, Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 25:329-348.

Sengun, H.I. and Karahan, M. (2013). Hedonic Consumption Habits And The Causes That Consumer’s Motivating Such Habits, University of Dicle Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2 (4): 13-26.

Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I. and Gross, B. L. (1991). Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications, Cincinnati, Ohio, South-Western Publishing Co.

Solomon, M. R. (2006). Consumer Behavior Buying, Having and Being, 7th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Editions.

Spangenberg, E. R.,. Voss, K. E. and Crowley, A. E. (1997). Measuring The Hedonic And Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitude: A Generally Applicable Scale, Advances in Consumer Research, 24:235 241.

Teo, T. S. H. (2006). To Buy or Not To Buy Online: Adopters And Non-Adopters of Online Shopping In Singapore, Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(6): 497-509.

Thompson, S. and Teo, H. (2002). Attitudes toward Online Shopping and The Internet Behaviour, Information Techonology, 21(4):259-271.

To, P. L., Liao, C. and Lin, T. H. (2007). Shopping Motivations on Internet: A Study Based on Utilitarian and Hedonic Value, Technovation, 27:774–787.

Topaloglu, C. (2009). Shopping Motivations which Affect The Consumer Behaviour: An Application on Online Shopping, Unpublished Master Thesis, Kocaeli, Gebze Institute of Technology, Institute of Social Sciences.

Turan, H. (2008).  Factors Effecting Online Shopping Behaviors: A Model Suggestion with Extended Technology Acceptance Model, Academic Informatics 2008 Conference Proceedings, Jan 30-Feb 1, 723-731, Canakkale, Turkey.

Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) (2018). Household Information Technology Use Research. Newsletter, Issue: 27819, 08 August. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24862 (20.10.2018).

Unal, S. and Ceylan, C. (2008). Reasons to Reach Consumers Hedonic Shopping: A Comparative Study in Istanbul and Erzurum Provinces, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 22 (2): 265-283.

Usta, R. (2006). A Research on The Consumers' Demographic Characteristics And Buying Behaviour on Internet, Third Sector Social Economic Review 41(3):1-13.

Vijayasarathy, L. R. and Jones, J. M. (2000). Intentions to Shop Using Internet Catalogues: Exploring The Effects of Product Types, Shopping Orientations, and Attitudes Toward Computers. Electronic Markets, 10(1):29-38.

Wen, H. J., Chen, H.-G. and Hwang, H.-G,(2001). E-Commerce Web Site Design Strategies and Models, Information Management &Computer Security, 9(1): 5-12.

Westbrook, A. R. and Black, W. C. (1985). A Motivation-Based Shoppen Typology, Journal of Retailing, 61(1):78–103.

Yayla, K. (2010). New Approaches of Internet Marketing: Impacts of Online Social Networks to Purchase Behavior of University Students, Unpublished Master Thesis, Manisa, Celal Bayar University, Institute of Social Sciences.

  • Guide for submission
    • Review Process
  • Review Process
  • Call for Papers
  • Submission
  • special issues
copyright ©2022 journal of organizational behavior research all rights reserved