• homepage
  • AIM And SCOPE
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • current issue
  • Archive
  • INDEXING
  • Contact Us
  • Submission

Formation Of Students` Creativity Potential In Intellectual Schools
Lenura TLEUBEKOVA¹
Kalipa ATEMOVA¹
Aiman ISABAYEVA²
Guldana NURIDINOVA²
Nurlila BEKTAYEVA³
Balzhan SENGERBEKOVA⁴
ABSTRACT

The educational system in general and teaching approaches in particular in Kazakhstani schools is shifting from traditional approach to student-centered approach. Although there are a few research studies conducted in the Kazakhstani context on different aspects of education, there is not any research found on the impact of the educational program or school curriculum on the creativity level of students in Kazakhstan. Thus, the main purpose of this research was to study the influences of educational program of the research site on improvement of the creativity potential of students in one of the experimental schools in Kazakhstan. The qualitative research was conducted within the research instruments such as semi-structured interviews, document analysis and classroom observations. The participants were 12 students of grades 7-12 and 12 teachers of various subjects. The research findings revealed that the structure of the school curriculum is effective for improving students` creativity skills. However, implementation of more flexibility is recommended for developing the students` creativity in a more effective way. Thus, the findings of the research suggest some recommendations for both curriculum developers and school administration to take into consideration the students` and teachers` voices for advancing the sections of school curriculum focused on creativity improvement. The study also makes recommendations for further studies on improving the creative thinking skills in secondary school context with a larger sample, using mixed-methods research design. 



Keywords: Creativity , Creative Potential , Creative Thinking Skills

Download PDF
Select a format:
Download RIS
Download EndNote



references

Anara Alimbekova; Saltanat Abildina; Issatay Utebayev; Kalipa Atemova, Student Self - Governance as a factor for professional leadership development in the system of higher education, Revista ESPACIOS. ISSN 0798 1015 Vol. 39 (Nº 35), 2018
Butler, L.A., Gotts, E.E., & Quinsenberry, L.N. (1975). Early childhood programs. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merill.
Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data. Educational researcher, 26(6), 4-10.
Elliott, A. R. (1995). Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and the success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation. The modern language journal, 79(4), 530-542.
Gavora, P. (2006). Sprievodca metodológiou kvalitatívneho výskumu. Regent.
Jung, C.G. (2006). Analitik psikoloji [Analytical psychology]. (2nd ed.; E. Gurol, trans.). Istanbul, Turkey: Payel Yayinevi.
Kellog, R. (1970). Analyzing children`s art. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Marfuga Absatovna Absatova, Sabira Nishanbaeva, Toleuzhan Baibolovna, Nurpeisova, Kalipa Tursunovna Atemova, Experimental Study on Family Formation and Moral Values of Students, Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 2018, 6, 84-88
Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review, 62(3), 279-301.
Parkhurst, H. (1999). Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a construct. Journal of creative behavior, 33, 1-21.
TLEUBEKOVA et al.
161
Parnes, S. (1970). Education and creativity. In: P.Vernon (Ed.), Creativity: Selected readings, Penguin Books (pp. 341-354). Harmondsworth.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 532 pp.
Poole, M. (1980). Creativity across the curriculum. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Rogers, C. (1970). Toward a theory of creativity. In: P.Vernon, Ed., Creativity: Selected readings (pp. 137-151), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Runco, M.A. (2009). Simplifying theories of creativity and revisiting the criterion problem; A comment on Simonton`s hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 462-465.
Torrance, E.P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Torrance, E.P. (1965). Revarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Guide for submission
    • Review Process
  • Review Process
  • Call for Papers
  • Submission
  • special issues
copyright ©2022 journal of organizational behavior research all rights reserved