This study explores how job satisfaction and employee motivation affect organizational commitment and the intention to quit among airline employees in the Turkish civil aviation sector. Civil aviation began to grow significantly after World War II and has become a major industry in the 21st century. As the sector has expanded, many public and private organizations have emerged, requiring strong organizational structures to stay competitive in a dynamic environment. This research addresses the importance of employee motivation and job satisfaction as key components of organizational success. It highlights how these factors can lead to either increased organizational commitment or a higher intention to quit. A qualitative research approach was used, and data were gathered from 422 airline employees through an online questionnaire. The sampling method was convenience sampling. The participants, who come from diverse professional and cultural backgrounds, all work in the aviation sector, allowing the findings to be generalized. The results reveal that job satisfaction significantly influences employee behavior and organizational performance, while motivation alone does not have a strong impact. The study contributes to the literature by clarifying the relationships between these variables and demonstrating their role in organizational effectiveness in airline companies.
Introduction
The civil aviation is a strategic sector that develops rapidly on a global scale, is open to intense competition and requires a high level of service quality. Since the mid-20th century, this development has been driven by technological advances and increasing passenger demand, making the aviation sector critical not only for transportation, but also for employment and service economy. Yet, these advancements have made working conditions in the sector more complex, stressful and demanding. In particular, the shift system, high security responsibility and operational pressures directly affect the psychology of employees, presenting significant management challenges for the sustainability of human resources.
In this framework, Research on how employee inspiration and fulfillment in work affect corporate behavior has grown significantly, not only theoretically, but also in practice. Employees' commitment to work, motivation sources, rewards, perceptions of management style and social support levels shape their relationship with the organization, which in turn forms both their organizational commitment levels and intentions to quit. The literature indicates that high job satisfaction tends to increase organizational commitment; whereas in cases of job dissatisfaction, their tendency to quit increases. However, considering that these relationships may vary across sectors, the necessity for empirically supported analyses becomes evident, particularly in high-risk and dynamic industries.
This study examines the effects of job satisfaction and motivation factors on intention to leave the job and organizational commitment of airline employees working in the civil aviation sector in Turkey. Accordingly, data were collected from 422 airline employees through a questionnaire as a quantitative research method. Validity and reliability analyses of the research's scales revealed that their reliability was 0.924; the relationships between variables were tested with structural equation modeling.
The analysis's conclusion was that organizational commitment is significantly enhanced by job fulfillment, while also significantly reducing intention to leave the job. Conversely, it was discovered that while employee motivation may have indirect impacts on organizational commitment, it does not significantly affect it directly. These findings reveal that job satisfaction plays a central role especially in sectors such as civil aviation where service quality is largely based on human factors.
In this regard, the research both contributes to the theoretical literature and offers practical recommendations for shaping human resource management policies. The strategies to be developed may enhance employee satisfaction and, in turn, support the sustainable success of airline companies.
Conceptual Framework
Job satisfaction pertains to the psychological responses—including cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components—that an individual links to their work (Hulin & Judge, 2003). It is regarded as one of the key job attitudes that can be influenced by high levels of occupational stress and reflects an overall assessment of how suitable a person finds their job (Dartey-Baah et al., 2020).
Research on job satisfaction looks at how people are affected by their workplaces as well as how people are affected by their workplaces (Rowden, 2002). According to Locke (1970), the idea of job satisfaction may be thought of as a comparison process where an employee assesses a circumstance or item against a standard they believe to be advantageous or excellent. Job satisfaction is defined as "a pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's job as achieving or facilitating the attainment of one's job values, particularly when these values are linked to recognition" by Locke, a renowned scholar who has extensively researched this concept (Schwepker, 2001). Job satisfaction comprises the set of attitudes employees hold toward their jobs. Job satisfaction is a critical factor in employee sustainability. Employees with high job satisfaction represent a skilled workforce. Studies have demonstrated a favorable correlation between organizational success, customer satisfaction, and staff satisfaction (Stamolamprosa et al., 2019).
Motivation is an important subject that explains human behavior. Generally, it can be defined as the psychological processes that direct, initiate, and sustain action (Xiong & King, 2015).
The subjective assessment of the probability that an employee will leave the company in the near future is known as intention to quit. Takawira, Coetzee, and Schreuder (2014) define intention to resign as the desire to leave the company and look for work elsewhere. Using the intention to quit model, which attempts to explain the employees' conduct when they resign, Li, Kim, and Zhao (2017) first used intention to quit as a predictor of actual turnover behavior. The most reliable and direct indicator of employee turnover, according to earlier research, is the intention to leave (Dai et al., 2019).
Intention to quit is one of the most commonly discussed subjects in organizational commitment research. According to Arye and colleagues (1991), 37% of the variation in the desire to quit the company may be explained by commitment. Naturally, this is not applicable to all employees who consider leaving their organizations. Despite evidence suggesting that intentions are the best predictors of behavior, many individuals who think about quitting their jobs do not actually do so. Personality traits may influence behaviors associated with the intention to quit. Nevertheless, behavioral scientists generally consider intentions to quit as the most direct indicator of actual turnover behavior (Labatmediene et al., 2007).
Numerous definitions have been put up for the idea of organizational commitment, which has been seen as a variable of interest in and of itself. Changes in employment practices brought about by the global labor market and the growing number of options for qualified workers in the global economy have recently attracted more attention from academics (Jain et al., 2009).
Job satisfaction refers to the general level of satisfaction an individual has with their job and workplace. This satisfaction directly affects employees' attitudes towards the organization. Many studies in the literature reveal that individuals with high levels of job satisfaction develop greater emotional and organizational commitment to the organization. Analyses have shown that job satisfaction positively affects all dimensions of emotional, continuation and normative commitment. This shows that airline employees' satisfaction with their jobs contributes to establishing a longer-term and sincere bond with the organization.
This premise is further supported by the results of our investigation. It has been discovered that work satisfaction considerably lowers the likelihood of quitting a job. This situation shows that especially stressed and pressured airline employees have a significantly lower tendency to leave the job when their job satisfaction is high.
However, our research revealed no meaningful connection between corporate commitment and employee motivation. This result shows that the motivation sources of employees in the civil aviation sector may be based more on individual or short-term factors; motivation may not be directly effective in developing a long-term commitment to the organization.
However, this tendency is strongly correlated with the work environment, the nature of the tasks, and individual goals. In general, people who are highly motivated at work are less likely to quit, while people who are not as motivated are more likely to look for other positions.
Our research revealed no statistically significant correlation between motivation and quitting intention. This shows that motivation functions more towards personal success or economic goals rather than in the context of the organization and is insufficient to shape decisions to leave the job on its own.
Materials and Methods
Purpose, Scope and Importance of the Research
The research was produced from the doctoral thesis prepared by Elçin YAKUPOĞLU (Advisor: Asst. Prof. Dr. Canan TİFTİK). The study's primary goal is to ascertain how employee motivation and work satisfaction affect organizational commitment and desire to quit the aviation industry. In the study, the model created to reveal whether employee motivation and job satisfaction elements affect intention to leave the job and organizational commitment was tested with the help of structural equation modeling in order to achieve the measured purpose. In this context, the conceptual framework and theoretical background related to the variables used in the study were evaluated and the scope of the study was established in this way.
Limitations of the Research
The main limitations are time and cost constraints. Another limitation in the scope of the research is the limitation caused by the sample. The maturity time of the research and the data collection process in the research coincided with COVID-19. This situation brought about a process where human interaction was reduced to minimum levels worldwide. Naturally, the data was collected through online platforms.
Hypotheses and Model of the Research
H1a: The motivation levels of airline employees influence their continuance commitment.
H1b: The motivation levels of airline employees influence their affective commitment.
H1c: The motivation levels of airline employees influence their normative commitment.
H2: The motivation levels of airline employees influence their intention to quit.
H3: Employee retention is impacted by work satisfaction in the aviation industry.
H4: Affective commitment is influenced by airline employees' job happiness.
H5: The job satisfaction of airline employees affects their normative commitment.
H6: The job satisfaction of airline employees affects their intention to quit.
Population and Sample of the Study
The population of the study consists of employees working in the civil aviation sector in Turkiye. A non-probability sampling method, specifically convenience sampling, was preferred for this research. Due to the dynamic nature of the sector and high employee turnover rates, it was challenging to determine the exact size of the population; therefore, the commonly accepted figure of 384 for an infinite population was taken as a reference. In light of this, data were collected from a total of 422 participants using the convenience sampling method. The data were analyzed using the Smart-PLS software. Of the 422 participants, initial pilot data were collected from 51 individuals, and the results obtained from this subset were presented as a pilot study.
Data Collection Tools
In this study, quantitative research methodologies were employed. Consequently, a questionnaire was used as the main instrument for gathering data. The questionnaire consisted of five sections: one section covered demographic variables, while the remaining four focused on scales measuring the study’s research variables. The second section of the questionnaire specifically included a scale designed to measure intention to quit. This intention to quit scale was originally utilized by Harris et al. (2006). There are four items in all, and a five-point Likert scale was used for structuring. Confirmatory component analysis of the scale was performed under a single dimension that represented the intention to quit. A scale gauging the level of job satisfaction among workers in the civil aviation industry makes up the third component of the questionnaire. The original creators of the work satisfaction measure employed in the study were Martins and Proença (2012). The five-point Likert style was used to develop the scale, which included 20 items in total. It was subjected to confirmatory factor analysis under a single dimension representing job satisfaction. The fourth section of the questionnaire includes a scale measuring employee motivation among civil aviation personnel. The employee motivation scale employed in the study was developed by Tremblay et al. (2009). This scale consists of 18 items and was also structured using a five-point Likert format. It was analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis as a single-dimensional measure of employee motivation. Employees in the civil aviation industry, who make up the study population, are measured on organizational commitment using a scale in the fifth and final portion of the questionnaire. Allen and Meyer created and executed the organizational commitment measure that was utilized in the research (1990). The measure, which had 24 items, was created using a five-point Likert scale. The three aspects of continuation commitment, normative commitment, and emotional commitment were the subjects of confirmatory factor analysis (Table 1). Online platforms were used to acquire the data, which was gathered online.
Validity and Reliability of the Study
Table 1. Reliability Analysis Results of the Research Scale
|
SCALE |
Item number |
Cronbach Alpha |
|
Items for intention to quit |
4 |
0,75 |
|
Items for job satisfaction |
20 |
0,94 |
|
Items for motivation |
18 |
0,84 |
|
Items for organizational commitment |
22 |
0,69 |
|
General scale |
64 |
0,92 |
Data Analysis
The data gathered for the study was analyzed using two different computer-aided statistical data analysis systems, SPSS and Smart-PLS. Prior to doing the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis, SPSS was utilized to assess the reliability of the data and gather descriptive information about the participants. SPSS was preferred for these two analyses because it easily provides Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and presents frequency values related to demographic characteristics in a simple and systematic manner. For the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of the six-factor structure tested in the study, the Smart-PLS program was used.
Different tests were used for the measurement and structural models in the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) study carried out with Smart-PLS tools. Results were given based on reliability (Cronbach's Alpha, Reliability Coefficient (Rho_A), and Composite Reliability) and validity (convergent and discriminant validity) values after the measurement model was tested using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. For the structural model testing, path analysis was employed. Hypotheses were tested based on t values, p values, and path coefficients obtained through this analysis. The results of the data analysis were reported in the findings section.
Results and Discussion
Conclusions on the participants' demographics and descriptive traits: It is significant to notice that there were more male participants (64.0%) than female participants (36.0%). In terms of age distribution, participants aged 45–59 (10.7%) and those aged 60 and above (1.2%) are in the minority, while the distribution across other age groups appears to be relatively homogeneous. When examining the educational background of the participants, it appears that more than half of the participants hold a bachelor's degree (63.3%). Additionally, a significant proportion of the participants have a postgraduate degree (25.1%). In terms of marital status, the majority of participants are single (58.3%). When income levels are examined, it is observed that most participants fall within the “3001–6500 Turkish Liras” range (42.2%). Finally, regarding the participants’ length of service at their institutions, those with 0–5 years of service make up more than half of the total (55.7%). It can also be stated that the distribution of other service durations is relatively balanced.
Table 2. Statements Used in the Study, Factor Loadings, and Their Status
|
Normative commitment |
Factor loading |
Status |
|
I feel that remaining here is a moral or logical commitment, which is one of the primary reasons I keep working for this company. I also believe that loyalty is important. |
0,615 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
I have learned that I should remain loyal to my institution. |
0,638 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Lately, I’ve been noticing that people change jobs between organizations quite frequently. |
0,810 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In my opinion, one should always be faithful to their company. |
0,556 |
It was disabled |
|
I no longer think it makes sense to be a businessperson. |
0,885 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
The times when people spent their entire careers at a single institution were better. |
0,637 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Continuance commitment |
Factor loading |
Status |
|
If I decided to leave my company at this time, it would totally change my life. |
0,644 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Even if I wanted to, I would find it quite difficult to leave my firm at this moment. |
0,496 |
It was disabled |
|
Even if I wanted to, I would find it quite difficult to leave my firm at this moment. |
0,867 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Even if I wanted to, I would find it quite difficult to leave my firm at this moment. |
0,218 |
It was disabled |
|
Staying in my organization right now feels more like a necessity than a desire. |
0,566 |
It was disabled |
|
Lack of good alternatives would be one of the major repercussions of quitting this company. |
0,356 |
It was disabled |
|
Leaving our company would take a great deal of personal sacrifice, and no other organization is likely to provide the same overall rewards, which is one of the key reasons I still work here. |
0,882 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Leaving my organization now would not be too costly for me. |
0,569 |
It was disabled |
|
Affective commitment |
Factor loading |
Status |
|
In my organization, I don't feel like a "part of the family." |
0,827 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
With this organization, I don't feel "emotionally connected." |
0,813 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Spending the rest of my career at the organization I work for would make me happy. |
0,513 |
It was disabled |
|
I enjoy discussing my organization with people outside of it. |
0,329 |
It was disabled |
|
I feel the problems of my organization as if they were my own. |
0,479 |
It was disabled |
|
I think it would be as easy for me to get attached to another organization as it is to this one. |
0,663 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
I experience my organization's issues as though they were my own. |
0,577 |
It was disabled |
|
Spending the rest of my career at the organization I work for would make me happy. |
0,668 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Motivation |
Factor loading |
Status |
|
My job is the kind of work I chose in order to achieve some important goals. |
0,684 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
I chose this job to reach my career objectives, |
0,684 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
because it is a part of my life. |
0,413 |
It was disabled |
|
My work has become an integral part of my identity. |
0,834 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
It is a component of the life path I have selected. |
0,878 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
I want to be very good at my job—otherwise, I feel deeply disappointed. |
0,368 |
It was disabled |
|
I’m motivated by the satisfaction I get when I accomplish difficult tasks. |
0,467 |
It was disabled |
|
Sometimes I question whether I’m managing important responsibilities in my job. |
0,576 |
It was disabled |
|
For some reason, we are provided with unrealistic working conditions. |
0,578 |
It was disabled |
|
The income my job provides motivates me. |
0,754 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
A lot is expected from us in our work. |
0,578 |
It was disabled |
|
These kinds of jobs make me feel secure. |
0,211 |
It was disabled |
|
Taking on interesting challenges motivates me— |
0,445 |
It was disabled |
|
because I want to be a winner in life. |
0,291 |
It was disabled |
|
I want to be successful in my job; otherwise, I would feel very ashamed of myself. |
0,482 |
It was disabled |
|
I enjoy learning new things. |
0,278 |
It was disabled |
|
My job is the kind of work I chose in order to achieve a certain lifestyle. |
0,739 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
My job allows me to earn money. |
0,729 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Job satisfaction |
Factor loading |
Status |
|
In terms of the freedom my job gives me to implement my own decisions. |
0,878 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the opportunity to try my own methods in doing the work. |
0,817 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of being appreciated for doing my job well. |
0,812 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the opportunity for advancement in my job. |
0,791 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of how organizational policies are implemented. |
0,807 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the chance to do things using my own abilities. |
0,633 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the working conditions. |
0,837 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the sense of accomplishment I get from my work. |
0,736 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of how my supervisor manages the team. |
0,768 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the opportunity my job gives me to tell others what to do. |
0,485 |
It was disabled |
|
Regarding the connection between my labor and compensation. |
0,813 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of my supervisor’s competence in decision-making. |
0,698 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the job providing me with stable employment. |
0,613 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the opportunity to do something for other people. |
0,610 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Regarding the opportunity to sometimes try new things. |
0,775 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of the opportunity my job gives me to be a respected person in society. |
0,535 |
It was disabled |
|
In terms of the chance to work independently. |
0,605 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
In terms of my job keeping me constantly engaged. |
0,529 |
It was disabled |
|
In terms of how well my coworkers get along with each other. |
0,508 |
It was disabled |
|
In terms of my job not conflicting with my conscience. |
0,464 |
It was disabled |
|
Intention to quit |
Factor loading |
Status |
|
I plan to be with this organization five years from now. |
0,892 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
I plan to stay with this organization for a while. |
0,867 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
Sometimes I feel so uncomfortable that I consider changing jobs. |
0,863 |
It was used in the structural model |
|
If I received an offer from another organization tomorrow, I would turn it down. |
0,582 |
It was disabled |
Those with factor loadings below 0.60 were excluded (Table 2). The exclusion of these statements ensured that the other criteria supporting the consistency and significance of the model remained within the acceptable reference range (Şengel et al., 2022).
The analysis started with the measurement model in order to test the model developed within the parameters of the research. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was initially used in this situation. The studies were conducted using the Smart-PLS Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) tool. Six factors in all were used to conduct evaluations. As shown in (Table 3), the measurement model of the study indicates the formation of a six-variable structure. When examining (Table 4), it is observed that the measurement model in the study consists of a four-dimensional structure (Aloufi et al., 2022; BaSalamah et al., 2022; Hungund et al., 2022). Evaluations are conducted based on factor loadings and t-values (Karpov et al., 2023; Medvedev et al., 2023; Sapunova et al., 2023). The t-values of the items constituting the continuance commitment variable range from 1.610 to 3.002, while their factor loadings range from 0.644 to 0.882. The t-values of the items forming the affective commitment variable range from 3.022 to 35.757, and their factor loadings range from 0.615 to 0.885. The t-values of the items pertaining to the normative commitment variable range from 2.999 to 9.903, while the factor loadings vary between 0.633 and 0.827.
Table 3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
|
Dimensions (structures) |
t-value |
Factor loading |
|
CONTINUANCE COMMITMENT |
|
|
|
My life would be completely upended if I choose to quit my organization right now. |
1.610 |
0.644 |
|
I don't think I have many options if I want to leave this company. |
3.002 |
0.867 |
|
The fact that quitting would take a major personal sacrifice and that no other organization is likely to provide the same overall rewards is one of the key reasons I still work for this one. |
2.997 |
0.882 |
|
NORMATIVE COMMITMENT |
|
|
|
I no longer think it makes sense to be a businessperson. |
35.757 |
0.885 |
|
My conviction that loyalty is crucial is one of the primary reasons I still work for this company; I feel that being here is a moral or logical need. |
3.022 |
0.615 |
|
I have learned that I should remain loyal to my institution. |
3.168 |
0.638 |
|
The times when people spent their entire careers at a single institution were better. |
3.854 |
0.637 |
|
Lately, I’ve been noticing that people change jobs between organizations quite frequently. |
14.883 |
0.810 |
|
AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT |
|
|
|
I would be content to remain with the company I work for for the remainder of my career. |
5.466 |
0.668 |
|
I think it would be as easy for me to get attached to another organization as it is to this one. |
2.999 |
0.633 |
|
In my organization, I don't feel like a "part of the family." |
6.785 |
0.827 |
|
'Emotionally connected' is not how I would describe this institution. |
9.903 |
0.813 |
|
EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION |
|
|
|
My job is the kind of work I chose in order to achieve a certain lifestyle. |
9.604 |
0.739 |
|
It is part of the path I’ve chosen to live my life. |
15.500 |
0.878 |
|
My job is the kind of work I chose in order to achieve some important goals. |
4.744 |
0.684 |
|
The income my job provides motivates me. |
13.319 |
0.754 |
|
My job has become a fundamental part of who I am. |
18.938 |
0.834 |
|
I chose this job to reach my career objectives. |
6.158 |
0.732 |
|
My job allows me to earn money. |
7.918 |
0.729 |
|
JOB SATISFACTION |
|
|
|
In terms of the chance to do things using my own abilities. |
5.312 |
0.633 |
|
In terms of how organizational policies are implemented. |
15.797 |
0.807 |
|
In terms of the relationship between the work I do and the pay I receive. |
18.248 |
0.813 |
|
In terms of the opportunity for advancement in my job. |
12.795 |
0.791 |
|
In terms of the freedom my job gives me to implement my own decisions. |
27.034 |
0.878 |
|
In terms of the opportunity to try my own methods in doing the work. |
19.966 |
0.817 |
|
In terms of the working conditions. |
23.856 |
0.837 |
|
In terms of being appreciated for doing my job well. |
15.987 |
0.812 |
|
In terms of the chance to work independently. |
4.615 |
0.605 |
|
In terms of the sense of accomplishment I get from my work. |
9.732 |
0.736 |
|
In terms of the chance to do different things from time to time. |
10.393 |
0.775 |
|
In terms of how my supervisor manages the team. |
10.783 |
0.768 |
|
In terms of my supervisor’s competence in decision-making. |
8.378 |
0.698 |
|
In terms of the job providing me with stable employment. |
4.890 |
0.613 |
|
In terms of the opportunity to do something for other people. |
4.742 |
0.610 |
|
INTENTION TO QUIT |
|
|
|
I plan to stay with this organization for a while. |
27.065 |
0.867 |
|
I plan to be with this organization five years from now. |
22.996 |
0.892 |
For the variables beyond the dimensions of organizational commitment, evaluations are also conducted based on t-values and factor loadings. When examining (Table 3), it is observed that the t-values of the items constituting the employee motivation variable range from 4.744 to 18.938, while the factor loadings range from 0.684 to 0.878. The t-values of the items forming the job satisfaction variable range from 4.615 to 27.034, and their factor loadings range from 0.605 to 0.837. Finally, the t-values of the items related to the intention to quit variable range from 20.660 to 27.065, while the factor loadings vary between 0.863 and 0.892. Based on all these findings, it can be stated that the factor loading values obtained from the study support the measurement model in accordance with both the essential criteria required by the Smart-PLS software and the core metrics of social sciences (Hair et al., 2010; Doğan, 2019).
Table 4. Fornell-Larcker Discriminant Validity Criterion
|
|
Fornell-Larcker Criterion |
|||||
|
Variables |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
Continuance commitment (1) |
0.805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affective commitment (2) |
0.083 |
0.725 |
|
|
|
|
|
Normative commitment (3) |
0.148 |
-0.705 |
0.740 |
|
|
|
|
Employee motivation (4) |
0.184 |
0.590 |
-0.428 |
0.767 |
|
|
|
Job satisfaction (5) |
0.167 |
0.780 |
-0.623 |
0.677 |
0.751 |
|
|
Intention to quit (6) |
0.332 |
0.645 |
-0.441 |
0.528 |
0.726 |
0.874 |
When examining the results (Table 4), the value for continuance commitment was determined to be 0.805, which is the highest value in its respective column. For the affective commitment variable, the diagonal value was found to be 0.725. This value is the highest (101) in both its column and row. For the third commitment variable, normative commitment, the value was identified as 0.740. As expected, this diagonal value—highlighted in bold—is the highest in its respective row and column. Among the variables representing the dimensions of organizational commitment, employee motivation (0.767), job satisfaction (0.751), and intention to quit (0.874) exhibited higher diagonal values compared to others. According to evaluations based on the Fornell-Larcker criterion, the condition of discriminant validity has been met in this study.
Table 5. Discriminant Validity of the HTMT Ratio
|
|
Heterotrait – Monotrait Ratio |
|||||
|
Variables |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
Continuance commitment (1) |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affective commitment (2) |
0.353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normative commitment (3) |
0.308 |
0.893 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee motivation (4) |
0.226 |
0.643 |
0.537 |
|
|
|
|
Job satisfaction (5) |
0.236 |
0.812 |
0.729 |
0.721 |
|
|
|
Intention to quit (6) |
0.413 |
0.715 |
0.562 |
0.580 |
0.801 |
|
As a result of the conducted evaluations (Table 5), the HTMT values were found to range between 0.226 and 0.893. Based on the available data and the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio values, it is evident that the Fornell-Larcker criterion values supporting discriminant validity have also been confirmed in the study.
Table 6. AVE coefficients for the variables
|
Variable |
Item number |
AVE |
|
Continuance commitment |
3 |
0,65 |
|
Affective commitment |
5 |
0,53 |
|
Normative commitment |
4 |
0,55 |
|
Employee motivation |
7 |
0,59 |
|
Job satisfaction |
15 |
0,57 |
|
Intention to quit |
3 |
0,77 |
It was observed that the AVE values for all constructs were above 0.50 (Table 6). These values provide reference information that convergent validity has been established in the study.
Table 7. Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficients for the Variables
|
Variable |
Item number |
Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficients |
|
Continuance commitment |
3 |
0,72 |
|
Affective commitment |
5 |
0,78 |
|
Normative commitment |
4 |
0,72 |
|
Employee motivation |
7 |
0,88 |
|
Job satisfaction |
15 |
0,94 |
|
Intention to quit |
3 |
0,85 |
For all variables, the reliability coefficients obtained from the three reliability analyses tested were found to be above 0.70 (Table 7). These reliability coefficients indicate that the condition of reliability has been met in the study. In fact, the benchmark value of 0.70 is widely accepted in the social sciences (Gudykunst & Hammer, 1988; Hong et al., 2012; Oldmeadow et al., 2013; Paraskevas et al., 2013). Similarly, this value is also considered acceptable for structural equation modeling analyses conducted via Smart-PLS (Doğan, 2019).
For the variables constituting the three dimensions of affective commitment, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated as 0.72 for the three items of continuance commitment, 0.78 for the five items of affective commitment, and 0.72 for the four items of normative commitment. For the employee motivation variable, which consisted of seven items, the alpha value was found to be 0.88. The Cronbach's alpha value for the work satisfaction variable, which included 15 items, was 0.94. Finally, the alpha value for the three-item intention to quit variable was determined to be 0.85.
For the variables representing the three dimensions of affective commitment, the Reliability Coefficient (Rho_A) was calculated as 0.79 for the three items of continuance commitment, 0.85 for the five items of affective commitment, and 0.74 for the four items of normative commitment. The Rho_A value for the employee motivation variable, which consisted of seven items, was found to be 0.90. For the job satisfaction variable, composed of fifteen items, this value was 0.95. Finally, the intention to quit variable, measured through three items, had a Reliability Coefficient (Rho_A) value of 0.85.
For the variables representing the three dimensions of affective commitment, the composite reliability values were calculated as 0.84 for the three items of continuance commitment, 0.85 for the five items of affective commitment, and 0.83 for the four items of normative commitment. The composite reliability value for the employee motivation variable, measured through seven items, was found to be 0.91. For the job satisfaction variable, which consisted of fifteen items, this value was calculated as 0.95. Lastly, the intention to quit variable, composed of three items, yielded a composite reliability value of 0.91.
Structural Model
To evaluate the model's capacity for prediction, Q² values were examined. Generally, it is expected that Q² values be greater than zero. The model's predictive value in the current investigation varied depending on how the dependent variables and the two independent variables (113) were related. While the predictive power was high for job satisfaction, it was found to be low for employee motivation (Chen & Huang, 2019). This finding is also clearly reflected in the level of support observed for the related hypotheses. Furthermore, the f² values presented in Table. Show how well the independent variables in the model can explain the data, and the findings imply that these f2 values are also in line with research outcomes that are deemed acceptable (Doğan, 2019).
After doing route analyses for this study, it was shown that employee motivation had no effect on organizational commitment. For the three aspects of commitment—normative, continuation, and emotional commitment—this impact was not seen. The goal was to show that corporate commitment and employee motivation were linearly related. However, studies conducted in different fields have demonstrated such a relationship. In their research of engineers, for example, Salleh et al. (2016) found a favorable correlation between organizational commitment and job motivation. Ultimately, it can be concluded that companies must increase job motivation if they want to raise employee commitment levels.
Conclusion
According to the results of the study, employee motivation among airline personnel does not appear to influence their intention to leave the job. In organizational structures of businesses operating at many sectors, a non-linear interaction is typically expected between employee motivation and intention to quit. Employees with higher motivation are less likely to consider leaving their jobs. Nevertheless, there isn't much research looking at this link in the world of civil aviation. One such study, carried out by Sever (2017), showed that work processes might be impacted by employee motivation. The paucity of studies examining the relationship between motivation and intention to leave (or the propensity to change occupations) in the civil aviation industry may be the reason for the absence of a meaningful association found in this study. Additionally, this may be resulted from different sector dynamics of the civil aviation and the relatively high mobility of airline employees. Furthermore, an examination of the demographic distribution in the present study reveals a predominantly younger age group. This may influence loyalty levels and, consequently, intention to leave the job. It is worth noting that numerous studies across different fields have established a relationship between these two variables (Badrieva et al., 2023; Bisri et al., 2023; Saada et al., 2023; Karim et al., 2024; Mohammad et al., 2024; Rohmani et al., 2024).
From the standpoint of job satisfaction, it was discovered that while job satisfaction among airline employees positively impacted both normative and affective commitment, it had no influence on organizational commitment for continuity commitment. In the civil aviation industry, prior research has also shown that work satisfaction has an impact on organizational commitment. The organizational commitment of workers in the civil aviation sector was found to be positively impacted by job satisfaction in this study. Notably, the assessments were carried out directly in terms of total organizational commitment rather than using the organizational commitment scale's sub-dimensions.
The desire of airline workers to quit their jobs is also influenced by their level of job satisfaction. Additionally, the link between intention to leave the work and other relevant factors is mediated by job satisfaction.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to express their heartfelt gratitude to their family for their unwavering support and encouragement throughout this research journey. Their belief in the authors has been a constant source of motivation and strength.
Conflict of Interest: None
Financial Support: None
Ethics Statement: None
Aloufi, B. H., Atwan, M. A., & Alshammari, A. M. (2022). Treatment of hypertension by using natural herbs and their mechanism of action. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 13(2), 19–28. doi:10.51847/wx7mN3flrC
Badrieva, A. B., Bichenov, G. G., Haluhoeva, Z. A., Arapieva, A. A., Baykhanov, R. M., Khalibekova, Z. N., Mattcieva, P. M., & Salimova, A. S. (2023). Phytopharmacotherapy of neurodegenerative disorders of the rat brain with an aqueous extract of Chlorophytum comosum. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 13(3), 13–18. doi:10.51847/Q0vmEAMGD5
BaSalamah, M., AlMghamsi, R., AlTowairqi, A., Fouda, K., Mahrous, A., Mujahid, M., Sindi, H., & Aldairi, A. (2022). The effect of coffee consumption on blood glucose levels. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 13(2), 64–69. doi:10.51847/VOLNuKyp3c
Bisri, D. Y., Hallis, I. K., Saputra, T. A., & Bisri, T. (2023). Brain relaxation score on craniotomy brain tumour removal with adjuvant thiopental and dexmedetomidine: a case report. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 13(3), 73–78. doi:10.51847/CTKVDUSitR
Dai, Y. D., Zhuang, W. L., & Huan, T. C. (2019). Engage or quit? The moderating role of abusive supervision between resilience, intention to leave and work engagement. Tourism Management, 70, 69–77.
Dartey-Baah, K., Quartey, S. H., & Osafo, G. A. (2020). Examining occupational stress, job satisfaction and gender difference among bank tellers: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(7), 1437–1454.
Doğan, D. (2019). Data analysis with SmartPLS. Ankara: Zet Publication.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Hammer, M. R. (1988). Strangers and hosts: an uncertainty reduction based theory of intercultural adaptation. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), Cross-cultural adaptation: Current approaches (pp. 106–139).
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hong, J. C., Chiu, P. Y., Shih, H. F., & Lin, P. S. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, competitive anxiety and flow state: Escaping from firing online game. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 70–76.
Hulin, C. L., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attitudes. Handbook of psychology, 255-276.
Hungund, B. S., Tennalli, G. B., Achappa, S., & Divate, M. N. (2022). Production and partial purification of thermostable chitinase from Bacillus cereus BSH-4 and its antifungal activity. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 13(2), 46–53. doi:10.51847/RAlF1H5BCe
Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2009). Employee wellbeing, control and organizational commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(3), 256–273.
Karim, S., Kutbi, D., Alkreathy, H., Alharthy, B., Alsieni, M., Daghistani, H., Shakroun, O. H., Bazuhair, M., Barasheed, M. O., & Ali, A. S. (2024). Amlodipine protects against methotrexate nephrotoxicity by modulating inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis through NF-κB/PPAR-β/caspase 3 pathways. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 14(4), 7–17. doi:10.51847/niC6BprrEv
Karpov, V. Y., Medvedev, I. N., Komarov, M. N., Puchkova, N. G., Sharagin, V. I., & Petina, E. S. (2023). The influence of regular physical activity on the functional parameters of the youthful organism. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 14(2), 18–23. doi:10.51847/QB2dBXs8ij
Labatmediene, L., Endriulaitiene, A., & Gustainiene, L. (2007). Individual correlates of organizational commitment and intention to leave the organization. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(2), 196–212.
Locke, E. A. (1970). Job satisfaction and job performance: a theoretical analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5(5), 484–500.
Medvedev, I. N., Komarov, M. N., Karpov, V. Y., Dorontsev, A. V., Dorontseva, X. A., & Sysoeva, E. (2023). The effect of regular physical activity on platelet activity in men of mature age. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 14(2), 50–60. doi:10.51847/59bnth85LH
Mohammad, A. A., Elnaem, M., & Ong, S. C. (2024). Understanding diabetes management among patients in Hail city using the health belief model. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 14(4), 28–33. doi:10.51847/AqAVGRxPXc
Oldmeadow, J. A., Quinn, S., & Kowert, R. (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1142–1149.
Paraskevas, A., Altinay, L., McLean, J., & Cooper, C. (2013). Crisis knowledge in tourism: types, flows and governance. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 130–152.
Rohmani, S., Astirin, O. P., Marliyana, S. D., & Handayani, N. (2024). Analysis of flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of Curcuma caesia Roxb grown in different geographical areas. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 14(4), 69–75. doi:10.51847/yy1abuEXOj
Rowden, R. W. (2002). The relationship between workplace learning and job satisfaction in U.S. small to midsize businesses. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(4), 407–425.
Saada, M., Morrissey, H., & Ball, P. (2023). Importance of healthcare professional training on medication safety, medication error prevention, and reporting. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 13(3), 1–7. doi:10.51847/nsvLedyP4z
Salleh, S. M., Zahari, A. S. M., Said, N. S. M., & Ali, S. R. O. (2016). The influence of work motivation on organizational commitment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(58), 139–143.
Sapunova, D. A., Kachenkova, E. S., & Medvedev, I. N. (2023). The study of gender characteristics of arterial hypertension in the first and second stages. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 14(2), 24–31. doi:10.51847/S1aMjIftGe
Schwepker, C. H. (2001). Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover in the sales force. Journal of Business Research, 54, 39–52.
Şengel, Ü., Genç, G., Işkın, M., Çevrimkaya, M., Assiouras, I., Zengin, B., & Buhalis, D. (2022). The impacts of negative problem orientation on perceived risk and travel intention in the context of COVID-19: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Tourism Futures, 1–22. doi:10.1108/JTF-05-2021-0130
Stamolamprosa, P., Korfiatis, N., Chalvatzi, K., & Buhalis, D. (2019). Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in high contact services: Insights from employees’ online reviews. Tourism Management, 75, 130–147.
Xiong, L., & King, C. (2015). Motivational drivers that fuel employees to champion the hospitality brand. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 58–69.